When deciding how to bring product ideas to life, businesses often consider partnering with a design studio, hiring an in-house team, or working with freelancers. While design studios offer many advantages, there are several challenges to consider compared to the other options.

Firstly, dedicated attention can be an issue with design studios. Since they manage multiple clients, their focus is shared. In contrast, a full in-house team dedicates its efforts solely to one company, and freelancers can sometimes provide undivided attention depending on their workload.

Cultural integration is another challenge. Design studios might not be as deeply embedded in a client's company culture as an in-house team, which can affect the seamlessness of collaboration. Freelancers also vary in their ability to adapt to different company cultures, often working remotely and less integrated into the company’s daily environment.

Availability is a concern as well. As project-based services, design studios might not always be available for immediate new projects, whereas an in-house team is constantly available during employment. Freelancers' availability can be inconsistent, depending on their other commitments.

Long-term engagement with design studios is typically short-term and project-based. In contrast, hiring a full team provides long-term employment and ongoing support. Freelancers, often engaged for short-term projects, can be rehired but still lack the continuity of an in-house team.

Communication can also pose challenges. While design studios strive for clear and effective communication, there might be some hurdles compared to the ease of in-person communication with an in-house team. Freelancers, often working remotely, may face similar challenges.

Finally, client control is limited with design studios. Clients have less control over the studio team's daily tasks compared to managing an in-house team directly. While freelancers offer moderate control, their independent nature can still pose challenges in aligning with the client's immediate needs and goals.

These challenges highlight the importance of evaluating specific business needs and project requirements when deciding between a design studio, an in-house team, or freelancers.

When bringing product ideas to life, one of the most significant considerations for businesses is the cost. Comparing the cost of hiring a full team, working with various freelancers, and partnering with Hasani Studio reveals clear advantages in terms of efficiency and savings.

‍
‍
High Costs of Hiring a Full Team
‍
Hiring an in-house team involves substantial expenses. For a typical project, you might need at least four key professionals: an industrial designer, a mechanical engineer, a prototyping engineer, and a project manager. Here are some of the associated costs:
‍
‍Salaries and Benefits: Each team member requires a competitive salary along with benefits such as health insurance, retirement contributions, and paid leave. This alone can run into hundreds of thousands of dollars annually.

‍Insurance: Providing comprehensive insurance for employees adds another significant cost layer.

‍Equipment and Software: High-quality equipment and specialized software licenses are necessary for design and engineering work, which requires a considerable upfront investment and ongoing maintenance costs.

‍Office Space: Providing office space for the team involves rent, utilities, and other overheads.

‍Training and Development: Investing in continuous professional development and training for the team members is essential but costly.

‍

Costs of Working with Various Freelancers
‍
While freelancers might seem like a more flexible option, they come with their own set of challenges and hidden costs:
‍
‍Variable Rates: Freelancers charge variable rates, which can sometimes be higher than expected, especially for specialized skills.

‍Coordination Effort: Managing multiple freelancers requires significant time and effort in coordination, which can slow down the project and increase costs.

‍Inconsistent Quality: The quality of work can vary greatly between freelancers, leading to potential rework and additional costs.

‍Lack of Continuity: Freelancers may not be available for the entire duration of the project, causing delays and requiring additional onboarding for new hires.

‍Integration Issues: Ensuring that the work of various freelancers aligns seamlessly can be challenging, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs.

‍

Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness of Hasani Studio

Partnering with our studio offers a streamlined, efficient, and cost-effective solution:

‍Single Point of Contact: With Hasani Studio, you have a single point of contact managing the entire project, reducing the time and effort needed for coordination.

‍Diverse Expertise: We provide access to a diverse range of skills, from industrial design to engineering and prototyping, without the need to hire multiple specialists.

‍Pay for Completed Work: Clients only pay for the work that is completed, ensuring cost-effectiveness and eliminating the risk of paying for idle time.

‍No Overhead Costs: There are no additional overhead costs for office space, equipment, insurance, or benefits.

‍Risk Management: Our contract-based approach ensures that any mistakes in prototyping or design do not incur extra costs for the client.

‍Faster Turnaround: Our streamlined processes and integrated approach ensure faster project completion, saving both time and money.